Design registration is a crucial aspect of protecting intellectual property rights, especially in industries that rely on unique product aesthetics. However, during the process of design registration, objections may arise, necessitating a proper response to avoid rejection. This article delves into design registration, the common objections faced, and how to effectively reply to them.
The legal procedure which grants exclusive product rights to original appearance designs including forms and arrangements and patterns and decorations constitutes design registration. Registrations under the Designs Act, 2000 of India protect original creators who receive business benefits from duplicate product development.
Protection by Law Blocks Unpermitted Replications.
This agreement provides an owner with exclusive rights which extend to ten years and can be extended by five more years.
Brand recognition and value receive an enhancement through market advantage.
Through licensing and monetization the design owner receives permission to license and place design rights up for sale.
During the scrutiny of a design application, the Indian Patent Office (IPO) may raise objections under various provisions of the Designs Act. Common reasons include:
Lack of Novelty : If a design is not new or has been published before the filing date, it may face rejection.
Prior Disclosure : If the design has already been made available to the public, it loses its uniqueness.
Non-Compliance with Design Definition : A design must be original and applicable to an article’s visual appeal; functional elements are not registrable.
Similarity with Existing Design : If a design closely resembles an already registered design, the application can be objected to.
Incorrect Classification : The wrong class under the Locarno Classification can result in an objection.
Non-Industrial Applicability : The design should be applicable to an industrial product and not be purely artistic.
Usage of Government Emblems or Scandalous Matter : If a design includes national symbols or offensive material, it will be objected to.
If an objection is raised, the applicant must file a well-structured reply addressing the concerns. Below are key steps to draft a strong response:
For novelty objections: Highlight the uniqueness of the design and provide prior art comparisons.
For prior disclosure objections: Demonstrate that the design was not publicly disclosed before the filing date.
For incorrect classification: Justify the chosen Locarno Classification with supporting industry standards.
A designer needs to successfully handle design objections in order to obtain design registration. The combination of adequate preparation and legal documentation and solid evidence increases the opportunity to resolve design objections. Businesses together with designers need to actively defend their intellectual property through Design Act requirements and expert help in case assistance is needed.
The information provided in this blog is purely for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, reliability and completeness of the content presented, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, for the same.
We expressly disclaim any and all liability for any loss, damage or injury arising from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this information. This includes, but is not limited to, any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damage.
Further, we reserve the right to make changes to the content at any time without prior notice. For specific advice tailored to your situation, we request you to get in touch with us.