Business regulations in India are evolving to make security dematerialisation an essential method that improves market transparency and operational performance. According to Rule 9A and Rule 9B of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 under the Companies Act, 2013 specific guidelines govern electronic security transactions. The rules are not directly released by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) even though MCA serves as the responsible authority to monitor and enforce rule compliance.

Rule 9A: Applicable to Unlisted Public Companies

Rule 9A is concerned with the dematerialisation process for unlisted public companies and is a part of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, which provides the regulatory framework for these companies.

Important Points of Rule 9A for Unlisted Public Companies

• Rule 9A obligates unlisted public firms to place their securities in electronic form through dematerialisation whenever these firms want to present their securities to public investors. All public companies require dematerialisation when making their first public share issuance through an IPO or additional public offering in an FPO. All public unlisted companies need to make their securities tradable through Demat accounts for trading purposes.

• Unlisted public companies who decide against stock exchange listing can make the Demat choice voluntarily to increase transparency and protect themselves from physical certificate risks.

• According to Rule 9A shares owned by unlisted public companies need to undergo transfer exclusively in Demat form to achieve secure, fast and transparent ownership changes.

• Unlisted public companies must operate with depositories while following the required procedures to accomplish physical share certificate conversion into electronic format.

Impact of Rule 9A on Unlisted Public Companies

• Unlisted public companies improve their transparency through Demat systems which minimise shareholding risks by eliminating physical certificate problems like theft and damage.

• Unlisted public companies that simplify their transfer systems gain enhanced investor trust which motivates them to use digital financial platforms.

Rule 9B: Applicable to Certain Private Companies

Rule 9B, introduced in January 2023, extends dematerialisation mandates to certain private companies, aligning them closer to public company standards. This aims to bring increased transparency and digital compliance to the private sector. Under Rule 9B the dematerialisation process determines the management of listed public companies' shares as well as those companies aiming to obtain stock exchange recognition. The rule provides standardised guidelines to maintain electronic management of all securities released by publicly traded companies.

Key Points of Rule 9B for Private Companies

• A company must ensure all its existing securities are converted to Demat.

• Listed public companies must strictly follow a specified deadline when they need to convert their securities into electronic format. Stock exchange companies needed to complete their security dematerialisation process before December 2018.

• Companies need to execute a procedure which aligns physical share certificates with matching Demat form holdings of shareholders. RTAs act as the primary managers for this process which occurs at Registrar and Share Transfer Agent facilities.

• Under Rule 9B only Demat accounts may be used for transferring securities of Privae Companies. The system disallows additional physical certificates to be issued thus speeding up secure transactions and cutting costs.

• All Demat transactions require companies to maintain thorough records to prove transparency through regular updates and ongoing record reconciliation.

Impact of Rule 9B

• The Demat system implementation for listed public companies forces better capital market transparency, which increases market visibility. Stock-related corruption becomes less likely because market transparency increases along with share certificate manipulation prevention.

• The dematerialisation process boosts market stability because investors can conduct transactions more easily, thus improving capital market liquidity.

• Reduction of operational expenses starts when commercial certificates disappear along with paper printing and traditional holding methods which produce notable reductions in organisational spending.

Comparison Between Rule 9A and Rule 9B

Impact of Dematerialisation on Stakeholders

For Investors:

• The Demat system provides investors with more efficient shareholding security features alongside transparent monitoring of their shareholdings.

• Electronic transactions function at increased speed, thus investors can complete their settlements in a shorter time frame and encounter less transaction delay.

• Investors now maintain improved control of their portfolios so they can execute immediate choices.

For Companies:

• Organizations achieve cost savings through the elimination of expenses which were associated with printing, storing and managing physical share certificates.

• The digitisation process for shared documentation decreases human errors which enables smoother business operations for the company.

• The procedure for regulatory compliance becomes less complex and companies achieve better regulatory adherence through simplified shareholder record management.

For Regulators:

• Better governance together with enhanced investor protection results from the increased market transparency which Demat systems provide to investors.

• Markets experience decreased scam activities since stock-related frauds including fake share certificates and misappropriation become less prevalent thus advancing market integrity.

Conclusion

India has witnessed an essential development in its securities market with the shift from physical certificates to digital Demat securities. Two rules under the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules of 2014 as per the Companies Act of 2013 govern the dematerialisation requirements of listed public companies and unlisted public companies. The capital market benefits from greater transparency and security and efficiency through the enforcement of these rules by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).

By complying with these regulations, companies can benefit from streamlined operations, reduced fraud risks, and increased investor confidence. The adoption of Demat systems ultimately contributes to a more modern, secure, and transparent securities market in India.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this blog is purely for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, reliability and completeness of the content presented, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, for the same. 

We expressly disclaim any and all liability for any loss, damage or injury arising from or in connection with the use of or reliance on this information. This includes, but is not limited to, any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damage.

Further, we reserve the right to make changes to the content at any time without prior notice. For specific advice tailored to your situation, we request you to get in touch with us.